Selfish Is the Afterlife

Before I was able to admit I was an atheist, I always was. My definition of god, was that much of Einstein‘s:

I do not believe in a personal god and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religion than it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.

I was always amazed by the expansive universe and it’s objects swirling about. My god was the every-flowing energy throughout space and time. Nothing like the Judea-Christian version of god.

That never changed. I am still in awe of the universe, but finally was able to admit what I love and feel within me is nature. Saying “I’m an atheist” or “there is no god” it is still so difficult these days… due to the incorrect negative stereotypes associated with being logical. When I was a kid, I never made an out-right atheist statement, but I sure laughed at anyone who believed in heaven or hell. As an innocent child I’d ask, “Wait, seriously? You believe that?” It seems rude today; however, children are known for being brutally honest. I understood how the idea of heaven was (and still is) a comforting thought, but also so selfish! As a young idealistic humanist, it horrified me that people actually couldn’t except the truth about death. Why isn’t the idea of becoming energy and always existing in nature comforting? To think you and your family’s spirits are floating around forever in some other plain of existence, to think you’re lifetime must last infinitely, how awfully incredibly selfish!

“A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.” – Albert Einstein

Bookmark/FavoritesEmailPrintShare
Related Posts:

,

About Rose Schwartz

I’ve always felt very connected to the Jewish culture, while lacking faith in the stories. I started blogging in 2006, mainly due to the the fact that "godless" is all too often equated with "immoral". Read More »
  • Hepzibah

    It is ironic that you quote Einstein in your assertion that there is no God, for, Einstein actually proved there is an after life. Matter can change into other matter or energy. Energy can be changed into other energy or matter, but neither can be destroyed (paraphrase).

    When we die, our bodies (matter) disinegrate into a combination of other matter and energy. However, human beings are so much more that just their bodies. They carry an energy, too, as experienced by their thoughts, memories and accumulated knowledge/wisdom. Christians call this the soul, but I am sure that you also have a name for this energy. If it cannot be destroyed – then where does it go?

    You stated that you believe only what you can see, hear, feel, taste and smell – yet you believe in the infinity of the universe – something that you cannot see, hear, feel, taste and smell.

    If I live my life believing in one God (living in relationship with him)and find at the end there is no life after death – what have I lost? But, for you – what if I am right?

    May God bless you, indeed.

  • Intergalactic Hussy

    There is no need to be arrogant.

    I never said I only believe in what I touch, taste, smell, hear, and see, so perhaps that’s you find what I say “ironic”.

    Energy forming from matter and becoming something else, eventually escaping into the atmosphere is exactly what happens. How could that possibly imply Heaven? It is awfully sad you believe Einstein proved your version of the afterlife.

  • Ian

    Hepzibah:

    Einstein was a pantheist (an atheist that views the laws of the universe as being ‘god’). He did not believe in religion and he didn’t ‘prove’ there was an afterlife.

    What have you lost? A lot of time. You say you have a relationship with god, it must be a very one way relationship.

    The difference between believing in an infinite universe and believing in god is that it’s actually feasible to prove that the universe is ever-expanding, whereas you can never prove god’s existence since dogmatic believers will always change the definition of god every time you disprove the god theory.

  • John

    Hi, Im from Melbourne Australia.
    Please check out these related essays which “explain” the cultural implications of Einsteins famous archetypal equation.

    1. http://www.dabase.net/christmc2.htm
    2. http://www.dabase.net/spacetim.htm
    3. http://www.dabase.net/dht6.htm

    Plus 3 related references on the meaning & significance of death.

    4. http://www.easydeathbook.com
    5. http://www.dabase.net/dualsens.htm
    6. http://www.dabase.net/noface.htm